Archive for March, 2009

Gangajal Mentality in Jharkhand

A conscientious cop trying to improve the system meets stiff resistance. When the villians have tested the system’s patience to the limit subordinates of this honest cop snap and take their frustration out by drowsing acid on the villians. In no time the cowardly town terrorized by Yadav family is rejuvenated and takes matters in its hands dowsing acid on every criminal – taking law in their own hands.

Just fiction? Not really. Reality is closer to Reel than we sometimes realize. Recently, villagers in eastern India burned eight suspected robbers alive and beat four others to death.

Is it an illustration of human’s beastly nature? senseless mob violence? or something deeper? more serious? The incident took place in Pakur district of Jharkhand (a State in Eastern India), a State known for its lawlessness and ‘jungle raaj’. Corruption is deep rooted and the State machinery has failed so miserably that citizens are left with no choice but to take the law in their hands to protect themselves against crime.

Say Hello to North Korea: An Introduction

The Korean region has suffered a long history of occupations, tyranny and invasions. First Mongolian occupation (from 1231 until the 14th century) then Japanese invasions (in 1592 and 1597) and then the inglorious year of 1910 when post Sino Japanese and Russo Japanese wars Japan annexed the Korean territory to its expanding empire. Relief from Japanese atrocities came with a cost after the end of World War II. Soon after Japan relinquished its control, Korea was divided into two occupation zones. United States occupied the Southern half of the Peninsula while U.S.S.R occupied the area north of the 38th parallel. As neither country planned on continuous occupation U.S, U.K, Soviet Union and China began negotiations to determine the “Korean Question”. However, the negotiations failed and the matter was submitted to the UN General Assembly. As generally happens when a nation’s fate lies in third party’s hands, August 15, 1948 the Republic of Korea was established in the South while September 9, 1948 the North established the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea dividing the Korean homeland into two bitter parts. The division separated the mineral resources and heavy industry of the North from the light industry and agricultural base of the South. Though the war damage was monumental both sides it was greater in North where U.S. bombing virtually obliterated the industrial base.

Strife between both Koreas is deep due to age old ideological conflict of capitalism versus communism. While South Korea is more influenced by U.S and its capitalist ideology, North Korea till date follows communism. Due to their ideological beliefs development in the new nations proceeded in very different ways. South Korea, under U.S. guidance, embraced private enterprise and North Korea chose a command economy inspired by the Soviet Union.

In the 1950s and 1960s North Korea achieved rapid economic progress under its centralized direction of the economy. Extensive Soviet and Chinese aid also helped. South Korea too caught up in the mid 1960s and since then rapid development and loyalty to capitalist regime has made it one of the largest economies in the world.

Today South Korea is a world economic power while North Korea is destitute, subsisting on handouts, many from its longtime foes in the South. In absence of adequate development opportunities and in a bid to update its defense technologies North Korea resorted to selling its defense technology to countries like Pakistan for nuclear technology. North Korea’s nuclear ability has been a source of worry for the western world and Japan for a long time. The most recent example is reaction of U.S to North Korea’s declaration that it shall launch a satellite in coming days.

According to U.S and South Korean officials the ‘satellite launch’ is a cover up to test fire long range missile Taepodong-2. The missile is thought to have an intended range of about 4200 miles (6700 kilometers). Owing to the satellite launch 2 female American journalists have been detained while filming near the North Korea – China border.

This incident once again reminds us of the Non – Proliferation Treaty, its unsatisfactory success and allegations by various countries that while U.S takes the moral high ground and preaches de- nuclearization to the world  it maintains its own nuclear power and arsenal.

Another piece on U.S, world and Nuclear power some other day….

Death Penalty for broadcasting indecency: A perspective

A Turkish T.V series has ignited much controversy in the Arab world with its protagonists drinking wine, partying and kissing on screen. The series has offended the sensibilities of Arab clerics to such an extent that Saudi cleric Sheikh Saleh al-Luhaidan – head of the Supreme Judicial Council declared in a fatwa that it would be permissible to “kill” Satellite T.V executives for the offence of broadcasting “indecent material”.

Apart from the ‘indecency’ of the protagonists some believe that the Saudi cleric has also been offended by protagonist couple portraying a modern marriage where both husband and wife are partners and the wife is not subordinate or inferior to the husband.

Though threatening to ‘kill’ T.V executives broadcasting a program is extreme and deserves to be condemned, it does make us think about some issues.

America most influences social behaviors and media trends in present world. Portrayal of sex and violence in media has come to rest of the world from this country of freedom, dreams and ambitions. Yet, the American Sociologists and Psychologists have concluded that onscreen portrayal of sex and violence has been detrimental to average American youngster. American talk shows, Magazines constantly urge parents to increase control on what kids watch while parents plead Government to exercise more control on broadcasters.

A study conducted by RAND published in September 2004 issue of Pediatrics, studies 1792 adolescents between 12-17 yrs of age. It concluded that kids with higher exposure to sex on TV were almost twice as likely then kids with lower exposure to initiate sexual intercourse. Youth who watched more sexual content were more likely to initiate intercourse and progress to more advanced non-committal sexual activities in the year following beginning of the study.

Where does that leave Noor and such other T.V series on India, Pakistani, Chinese, Japanese and other channels? Though intimacy shown in Noor is basic and not shocking to viewers in countries where Media enjoys ‘freedom’ we must realize once we allow close up scenes of lips locked in a passionate kiss we are not too far away from more intimate bedroom scenes that must not be viewed by non adults.

Does that mean media should adher to dictates of moral police? No. Hallmark of a mature democracy or a truly free country is a population that’s free to decide the course of its life. But what does freedom imply? To be free – truly Free – an individual must:

1)      Be Informed of consequences, pros and cons of every option

2)      Have the ‘choice’ and ‘power’ to choose from these options.

Scientists, Psychologists and Sociologists world over and especially in the West have conducted extensive research on influences of all kinds of visual and audible sensory intakes on different age groups. Every State must ensure that a proper rating system based on these studies is developed for media so that the people have the means of selecting their favourite dishes from the palette of sensory stimuli.

Guerilla warfare against Democracy in Pakistan

Framers of Pakistan’s Constitution were visionaries who knew that Democracy (with all its flaws) was and would be in future the ideal form of Government for their beloved country’s progress and development. Their vision however did not anticipate recurring attacks on Democratic form of Government by the nation’s army. To give the Nation credit, after every Dictator’s rule be it Ayub Khan or Yahya Khan or Ziaul Haq or most recently Musharraf the Pakistani people have always brought their Nation back home to Democracy. This gives hope to all concerned about the well being of this State.

Recently however we have seen in Pakistan a new ‘Guerilla Warfare’ on Democracy. As the poison of Islamic Fundamentalism spreads from Afghanistan to Pakistan the fundamentalists have begun to challenge the “constitutionality” of Democracy as a form of Government for Pakistan – an Islamic Nation.

The preamble to the Constitution of Pakistan chooses Democratic form of Government “as enunciated by Islam”. The exact words are:

“to exercise its powers and authority through the chosen representatives’ who, in turn, are bound to fully observe ‘the principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social justice as enunciated by Islam”.  

According to Maulana Sufi Mohammad founder of Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi (TNSM) an elected legislature is alien to Islam and therefore it can be argued in a ‘Constitutionally’ set up Court of Justice that Pakistan must renounce Democracy as an elected legislature is “Unconstituional”. The “as enunciated by Islam” at the end of Preamble works as a precondition to all that which the Preamble states.

This is definitely the most serious attack on Democracy that Pakistan has ever faced. The fact that Maulana Sufi Mohammad has some public support only makes it grave.

Note: Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi (TNSM) is a Pakistani militant organisation with Wahabi and Deobandi leanings that strives at implementing Sharia in Pakistan. In 2002 it was banned and declared a terrorist outfit.